Transcript for Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer

Below is the transcript of the following Academic Medicine Podcast episode: Advice from a Master Peer ReviewerOriginally posted August 2018, Reposted September 6, 2021 Read more about this episode and listen here. Toni Gallo: Hi all. This week I am reposting a discussion I had with Academic Medicine's former Editor-in-Chief David Sklar, and one of the …

Continue reading Transcript for Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer

Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer

This episode of the Academic Medicine Podcast was originally released in August 2018. Guest Carl Stevens, MD, MPH, joins hosts Toni Gallo and former editor-in-chief David Sklar, MD, to discuss the peer review process. Carl is a 10-time winner of the journal’s Excellence in Reviewing Award. He shares his reasons for serving as a peer …

Continue reading Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer

Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer

Discussing the peer review process, specifically the practice of evaluating a scholarly article as a peer reviewer, in this new episode of the Academic Medicine Podcast are editor-in-chief David Sklar and senior staff editor Toni Gallo and Carl Stevens, a master reviewer for the journal and a seven-time winner of the Academic Medicine Excellence in …

Continue reading Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer

Advancing the Community of Qualitative Research in Health Professions Education: What’s the role of conceptual frameworks in qualitative research?

Editor’s Note: The following post is part of a series of Peer Reviewer Resources written by some of Academic Medicine's top peer reviewers. Read other peer review posts. By: Bridget C. O’Brien, PhD, associate professor in the Department of Medicine and the Office of Research and Development in Medical Education at the University of California, San Francisco When …

Continue reading Advancing the Community of Qualitative Research in Health Professions Education: What’s the role of conceptual frameworks in qualitative research?

10 Tips for Reviewing a Qualitative Paper

  Editor’s Note: The following post is part of a series of Peer Reviewer Resources written by some of Academic Medicine's top peer reviewers. Read other peer review posts. By: Carol-anne Moulton, MD, FRACS, MEd, PhD, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, and Priyanka Patel, MSc, Wilson Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto This is a …

Continue reading 10 Tips for Reviewing a Qualitative Paper

An Introduction to Reviewing the Statistical Methods in a Study

Editor’s Note: The following post is part of a series of Peer Reviewer Resources written by some of Academic Medicine's top peer reviewers. Check back each Thursday for the next post in the series. Read more about our Peer Reviewer Resources.  By: Colin P. West, MD, PhD, associate professor of medicine and biostatistics, Division of General …

Continue reading An Introduction to Reviewing the Statistical Methods in a Study

Practical Strategies for Enhancing the Peer Review of Manuscripts

Editor’s Note: The following post is part of a series of Peer Reviewer Resources written by some of Academic Medicine's top peer reviewers. Check back each Thursday for the next post in the series. Read more about our Peer Reviewer Resources.  By: Sheila W. Chauvin, PhD, MEd, professor, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, and School of …

Continue reading Practical Strategies for Enhancing the Peer Review of Manuscripts

Making Peer Review Fulfilling Work

Editor’s Note: The following post is part of a series of Peer Reviewer Resources written by some of Academic Medicine's top peer reviewers. Check back each Thursday for the next post in the series. Read more about our Peer Reviewer Resources.  By: Thomas S. Huddle MD, PhD, professor of medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, UAB School of …

Continue reading Making Peer Review Fulfilling Work

An Interview with the Editors

Editor’s Note: The following is part of the Peer Reviewer Resources series. Check back each Thursday for the next post in the series. Read more about our Peer Reviewer Resources.  Editor-in-Chief David P. Sklar and Associate Editor Jan Carline, a previous top reviewer for Academic Medicine, discuss how they approach reviews, what they, as editors, look for in a …

Continue reading An Interview with the Editors

The (Re)View from the Other Side

Editor’s Note: The following post is part of a series of Peer Reviewer Resources written by some of Academic Medicine's top peer reviewers. Check back each Thursday for the next post in the series. Read more about our Peer Reviewer Resources.  By: Grace C. Huang, MD, director of assessment, Shapiro Institute for Education and Research, Harvard Medical …

Continue reading The (Re)View from the Other Side