What are your roles and responsibilities with Academic Medicine?I am an associate editor for the journal. This means that I review submissions and triage them for review or not (e.g., desk rejections). When submissions are reviewed, I review them again and make a decision on whether to further ask the authors for a revision (or not). …
Tag: peer review
Transcript for Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer
Below is the transcript of the following Academic Medicine Podcast episode: Advice from a Master Peer ReviewerOriginally posted August 2018, Reposted September 6, 2021 Read more about this episode and listen here. Toni Gallo: Hi all. This week I am reposting a discussion I had with Academic Medicine's former Editor-in-Chief David Sklar, and one of the …
Continue reading Transcript for Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer
Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer
This episode of the Academic Medicine Podcast was originally released in August 2018. Guest Carl Stevens, MD, MPH, joins hosts Toni Gallo and former editor-in-chief David Sklar, MD, to discuss the peer review process. Carl is a 10-time winner of the journal’s Excellence in Reviewing Award. He shares his reasons for serving as a peer …
Addressing Reviewer Comments Recap: Key Takeaways and Additional Resources
So far this week, we’ve shared tips for addressing reviewer comments that have come from the literature, longtime Academic Medicine authors, editorial board members, and the editorial staff. If you missed any of these, you can find them here. Today, we’d like to close the series by highlighting some key takeaways from the advice and tips …
Continue reading Addressing Reviewer Comments Recap: Key Takeaways and Additional Resources
Staff Suggestions for Addressing Reviewer Comments
To complement the advice from our longtime authors and editorial board members that we shared earlier this week, today we're sharing suggestions from the Academic Medicine editorial staff. This post is part of a series on tips for addressing reviewer comments during the revisions part of the publication process. You can read the other posts …
Continue reading Staff Suggestions for Addressing Reviewer Comments
Editorial Board Member Suggestions for Addressing Reviewer Comments
To complement the tips for addressing reviewer comments from longtime Academic Medicine authors that we shared yesterday, today we’re sharing suggestions from Academic Medicine editorial board members. This post is part of a series on tips for addressing reviewer comments during the revisions part of the publication process. You can read the other posts in …
Continue reading Editorial Board Member Suggestions for Addressing Reviewer Comments
Author Suggestions for Addressing Reviewer Comments
To complement the tips for addressing reviewer comments that we shared yesterday, today we’re sharing suggestions from longtime Academic Medicine authors. This post is part of a series on tips for addressing reviewer comments during the revisions part of the publication process. You can read the other posts in the series here. Daniel J. Schumacher, MD, MEd, Cincinnati …
Continue reading Author Suggestions for Addressing Reviewer Comments
Tips to Move from “Revisions Needed” to Resubmission
As an author, you may struggle when you receive a decision letter that requires revisions to your manuscript. Where do you start? How do you address everything the reviewers have asked? How do you organize your changes and convey them to the journal's editors? This week, we'll be sharing tips for addressing reviewer comments. Each …
Continue reading Tips to Move from “Revisions Needed” to Resubmission
Advice from a Master Peer Reviewer
Discussing the peer review process, specifically the practice of evaluating a scholarly article as a peer reviewer, in this new episode of the Academic Medicine Podcast are editor-in-chief David Sklar and senior staff editor Toni Gallo and Carl Stevens, a master reviewer for the journal and a seven-time winner of the Academic Medicine Excellence in …
Advancing the Community of Qualitative Research in Health Professions Education: What’s the role of conceptual frameworks in qualitative research?
Editor’s Note: The following post is part of a series of Peer Reviewer Resources written by some of Academic Medicine's top peer reviewers. Read other peer review posts. By: Bridget C. O’Brien, PhD, associate professor in the Department of Medicine and the Office of Research and Development in Medical Education at the University of California, San Francisco When …